The energy resolution of VERITAS will be considerably better than that
of the Whipple telescope for three reasons: (1) the shower
core location will be known, (2) several telescopes will view each
event at different distances from the shower core, and (3) each camera
will have finer pixellation (0.15
vs. 0.25
). The
location of the core of the shower will be estimated with an accuracy
of about 10m. With a single telescope, the core distance can be estimated
using the location of the image centroid relative to the
source position, but the correlation is not very tight and the
corresponding energy estimate is not very accurate. For the Whipple
telescope, the RMS energy resolution using this technique is
([Mohanty et al. 1998]).
For our estimate of energy resolution for VERITAS, we used simulated
showers from gamma-rays with energies >200GeV whose arrival
direction was reconstructed to within 0.1
of the source
position. We also required that each telescope record >20p.e.,
after image cleaning, to avoid images significantly contaminated by
NSB fluctuations. The reconstructed energy for an individual
telescope is a function of the amount of light in the shower, the
distance of the telescope from the shower core, and the location of
the image centroid relative to the source position. With the core
location known, the centroid location gives information about the
height of emission detected by the telescope, further improving the
resolution compared to a single telescope. The final energy estimate
for the array is the average from individual telescopes which detected
at least 20p.e.
The resulting overall energy RMS resolution is
0.10 - 0.15 from 0.2 to 10TeV.
The resolution improves slowly as the energy of the shower increases.
Below 200GeV, the energy resolution degrades somewhat, but not
significantly. This resolution will likely be improved through more
sophisticated energy estimates and through the use of more restrictive
cuts on events used in the energy analysis.